South Australian Ad Equates Kids’ Gaming with Future Gambling Problems

South Australian Ad Equates Kids’ Gaming with Future Gambling Problems

Some say this brand new ‘gaming equals gambling’ ad by the SA government goes too far

Set aside that new Xbox One or PS4 it just might turn you as a compulsive gambler. That will not have been the message that the South Australian Government was shooting for when they created their latest campaign that is anti-gambling but it’s the one that many gamers from Australia and around the world are using away from it, especially given that state’s previous stances that were seen as anti-gamer.

Gambling Is No Game

The new campaign is referred to as Gambling is not any Game, and based on what the SA Government has said in days gone by, it seems to have a fairly well-intentioned meaning behind it. The idea is that children whom play games that include gambling elements like slots or poker games may be more more likely to take up gambling habits later in life, or develop gambling problems even in their adolescence.

But the final product offers a slightly various message. An image of the poster from the campaign was spread across the Internet this week, showing a girl searching at an iPad while sitting at what appears to be always a poker dining table, filled with chips and cards. Above her there is a message that is ominous ‘Gambling begins with games.’

While the idea could be to especially target games with gambling content, the poster immediately sent gamers around the world into an uproar, because it generally seems to be connecting gaming in basic to issue gambling.

‘We’d like to state we are surprised at this kind of buzz from South Australia, but it’s regrettably more of the same unsubstantiated moral panic that we’ve become accustomed,’ stated Ron Curry, CEO associated with Interactive Games and Entertainment Association.

Strict, Stricter, Strictest

That may appear to be an overreaction if it had beenn’t for past actions by the SA national. For example, Southern Australia was one of the major holdouts in incorporating A r18+ category for video and computer games in Australia. Past to the classification, the greatest rating available for games was MA15+; any game that would have now been rated R18+ had been affectively banned from sale, because it was ‘Refused Classification.’ The new classification was ultimately agreed on by every state attorney general, and the R18+ classification had been introduced at the start of 2013, that has greatly reduced the number of prohibited games in Australia.

South Australia still keeps their own Classification Council that can rate games independently easily obtainable in the state. That plays a part that is important this new campaign, as the SA government plans to introduce laws and regulations that could need games with simulated gambling content to be classified as MA15+ (or potentially other regulated classifications). This may affect a surprisingly lot of games, as even unassuming games like some into the Pokemon series have showcased in-game slot machines. MA15+ games can’t be purchased or played by those under the age of 15 without the direction of a guardian or parent.

These aren’t the only steps being taken by the South Australian government as part of their kiddies, Technology and Gambling policy. Other initiatives include the creation of a Watch List that will inform parents about games and apps that have gambling content, an emphasis on teaching ‘cyber safety’ in schools, and a push to own simulated gambling be used as being a factor in rating classifications at the federal level.

Massachusetts Gaming Commission Okays Revere Vote While Caesars Sues

In the latest episode of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission hearings, Revere gets a shot and Caesars sues a part

Suffolk Downs may well have their modified casino plan approved by Revere voters but the state of Massachusetts isn’t using their word for this. The gambling commission announced this week that they’re ready to allow a Revere-only form of the Suffolk Downs casino plan to go forward, but only when race track/partner Mohegan Sun is willing to enable Revere to vote again this time on the brand new proposal.

Brand New Hope for Suffolk Downs

That decision is mainly a win for Suffolk Downs, which saw its hopes of an East Boston casino dashed on November 5. Voters there soundly rejected their casino proposal, which would have had all of the major buildings and parking facilities located in Boston. Nonetheless, Revere voters also went along to the polls that day the proposed casino would have bordered Revere, and some small elements of the center would have been in their city and overwhelmingly approved the same plan, developing a sticky situation for regulators.

That offered Suffolk Downs the idea of transferring the whole casino to Revere, one thing Revere seemed rather pleased to accommodate. But as numerous Boston officials argued, that wasn’t what the votes had approved on election time, also it was not fair to assume which they would be fine with a casino that is revere-only.

The Massachusetts state gambling commission ultimately consented with this, voting unanimously allowing a new referendum to be held. Suffolk Downs will have seven days to choose whether or perhaps not to accept this decision, with Suffolk Downs COO Chip Tuttle stating that they will likely achieve this.

Beneath the brand new proposal, Suffolk Downs would act as the landlord associated with the new casino property, while Mohegan Sun would build, very own, and run the casino itself. The facility that is new be independent of the battle track, which Suffolk Downs says would continue its current horse-racing operations.

Caesars Sues Commission Chair

Meanwhile, Caesars Entertainment the partner that is original Suffolk Downs features its own group of problems with the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. Caesars had been initially likely to be the partner for the East Boston casino project, but was dropped by the race track after state regulators raised issues over the business’s suitability, centered on strange allegations of an association with another resort team Gansevoort and their dealings with a third-party who was simply reported to have had dealings with a Russian mob figure.

Now, Caesars has filed a lawsuit against gaming commission chairman Stephen Crosby, stating that he possessed a prospective conflict of interest that he failed to disclose in a timely way. This conflict of interest, they say, impacted the objectivity and fairness of the state’s review of their suitability as a gambling operator.

Crosby said earlier this week that he made all of the necessary disclosures about his friendship and former business dealings having a co-owner of land that is designated for used in an Everett casino proposal by Wynn Resorts. Crosby said he would recuse himself from an assessment of the land deal Paul that is involving Lohnes who Crosby says he has known since the 1970s.

Caesars, though, claims that Crosby’s disclosures to Governor Deval Patrick and the continuing state Ethics Commission weren’t sufficient. The Wynn proposition would have to compete directly against a Suffolk Downs plan for the casino that is only in eastern Massachusetts, and therefore eliminating Caesars from the competition would help the Everett proposal’s chances of gaining that permit.

The Caesars lawsuit also alleges that they certainly were held to a different standard then several other casino operators who were bidding for licenses in the state. The recommendation that Caesars ultimately led to Suffolk Downs parting ways using them as a casino partner, and also the resulting confusion may have now been the determining factor in East Boston voters rejecting the casino plan.

Social Casino Index Shows Women Bet More Money that is virtual than

New data from the personal Casino Index shows American women bet more than men online, but only when it is play money.(Image: Getty)

Women in the U.S. bet 30 per cent more on online social casinos than men, which is astonishing news since typically men are connected more to gambling than ladies. Of course, they’re just gambling with Monopoly money, so it’s easier to bet large.

The interesting data was recently released by International Game tech (IGT), a world frontrunner in gaming systems technology, and DoubleDown Casino, which will be the largest social casino in the world.

Social casino web sites are categorized as those which are on offer via social network sites and present players the chance to play non-wagering casino games including poker, roulette and slots. The first ever Social Casino Index released jointly by the 2 organizations has used the statistics from more than six million individuals who play the DoubleDown Casino games on Facebook via their computer or device that is mobile month.

Middle-Aged Females Lead the Play Money Pack

The statistics showed that women are ahead of guys in gaming activities and gambled more virtual potato chips each session, with those involving the ages of 45 and 55 years old being the players that are main. These women can be also more likely to bet big, as males seemed to not bet greater than 7.6 million virtual chips per session, whereas women had been willing to rise to 10 million each time they played.

‘Due to the fact world’s largest social casino, we will always seeing to better understand our players and their preferences,’ explained the vice president of international marketing at IGT Interactive Group, John Clelland. ‘The personal Casino Index provides gaming industry a truly step-by-step check social casino player choices for the first time. It’s also fascinating to look into the similarities and huge difference in our players from shore to coast.’

For example, the personal Casino Index showed that more than 60 per cent of players in Nevada were women.

Across America, those living in Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming were more most likely to relax and play at social casinos, since these locations saw the concentration that is highest of players in the united kingdom.

Meanwhile, Hawaiians were found to be 20 percent more likely to try out on the move via mobile devices than the average off their states, and players from Maine were found to be 25 percent less likely to want to play from a device that is mobile so obviously they would rather stay put while playing.

Gambling with Faux Chips

Into the real-money gambling world, it’s generally accepted that men make up nearly all the pool of those with bad gambling habits. Also Clelland stated that IGT had the ‘belief that men would make the highest bets.’ But since women are topping the chart on social casino web sites, these data will likely raise concerns among those who see digital money gambling as a route to real-money gambling.

Even though the level has not yet been definitively calculated, many have already advertised that games which simulate gambling can result in problematic real-money gambling habits, particularly in the younger generation who could become used to clicking away, seeing their numbers go up and down, without really thinking about what they are doing. The hope would be, of program, that they make the distinction between virtual chips and real-money wagering if they elect to try their luck on a real online casino.